SABEW Teletraining

I just did a “teletraining” session for SABEW on the 2010 Economic Outlook  with Greg Ip of the Economist and Rich Miller of Bloomberg (SABEW = Society of American Business Editors and Writers). The audience was economic reporters and editors across the country, and the goal was to talk about some key themes for economics coverage going forward. Both Greg and Rich made some very good points, which I won’t repeat here. I focused on three themes:

1) How fast will  the labor market for college-educated workers recover? College-educated workers have been pounded, with their unemployment rate now at 4.9%.  Unless something really weird happens in December,  2009 will be the first year where employment of college-educated workers actually fell (the current data series goes back to 1992). I don’t think that we are having a “real” recovery until businesses start hiring high-end workers again.

2) How much of the stimulus is leaking overseas, in the form of imports? It looks like people are rushing back to the malls again–but they are buying things like big-screen televisions, which are mainly produced overseas.  In fact,  given current patterns of imports, we should think of increased consumer spending as a potential negative for the economy, because it drives up the trade deficit and increases the amount that we have to borrow from the rest of the world (on a related point, consumer spending is *not* 70% of the economy.  I’ll refer you back to a blog item that I wrote in my previous life).

3) County Business Patterns–if you want to understand your local economy, your best source is the Census Bureau’s County Business Patterns

http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/index.html

These underutilized numbers tell you, for areas as small as zip codes, employment and payrolls by industry. They have two big problems–first, they lag, so the latest data is for 2007.  Second, the Census Bureau doesn’t want to reveal data on individual companies, so if one or two companies dominate an industry in a local area, the numbers are presented in a way that obscures individual company data.

But for figuring out the most important industries in an area,  these figures are without peer.

Anybody who has any questions re economic coverage can write me at mmandel@southmountaineconomics.com

Added:  Before the conference call,  the SABEW folks asked me to come up with three blogs I like. Here they are:

 “Beat the Press” by Dean Baker

 “Econlog”  by Arnold Kling, Bryan Caplan, and David Henderson

  “Political Calculations”  by Craig Eyermann

Comments

  1. Really, Dean Baker? I’ll give the guy credit for being a little unpredictable but he’s mostly an earnest liberal hack with not much of a grounding in economics. As for Econlog, you should get the name right after all this time.😉 Never heard of Eyermann’s blog, doesn’t seem too great. You really need to drop the fair and balanced routine, particularly now that you’re not part of the mainstream media and their political masquerade. You have a political viewpoint, state it and back it up with facts and arguments when you can. The mass/broadcast media was about blanding down opinions to get a mass audience- the mush on most newspaper editorial pages is a perfect example of that- online media is about stating your opinion while trying to paint as precise a picture as you can. You have a chance to do that here, no need for the “on the one hand, on the other hand” equivocating of past media businesses.

  2. “How fast will the labor market for college-educated workers recover?”

    It won’t.

    Alan Greenspan doesn’t want it to; thinks such people are the cause of inflation (conveniently ignoring vastly humongously shock-inducingly excessive government spending and the Fed).

    NSF doesn’t want it to; depressed compensation for those with PhDs is something they’ve been working on since at least 1986, by flooding the job markets with cheap, pliant foreign labor throught the F (and OPT) and H-1B… visa programs.
    “A growing influx of foreign PhDs into U.S. labor markets will hold down the level of PhD salaries to the extent that foreign students are attracted to U.S. doctoral programs as a way of immigrating to the U.S.A. A related point is that for this group the PhD salary premium is much higher [than it is for Americans], because it is based on BS-level pay in students’ home nations versus PhD-level pay in the U.S.A… [If] doctoral studies are failing to appeal to a large (or growing) percentage of the best citizen baccalaureates, then a key issue is pay… A number of [the Americans] will select alternative career paths… For these baccalaureates, the effective premium for acquiring a PhD may actually be negative.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Archives

%d bloggers like this: